The Republican National Committee
has to see that there is a big problem here. It has been revealed that Trump’s
lawyer Michael Cohen negotiated a $1.5 million dollar settlement for a top
Republican fundraiser. The payments were made to a woman the mistress who was asked to have an abortion from the love child of the married Elliott Broidy, a deputy
finance chairman of the Republican National Committee that has ties to Trump. Elliott
resigned as a result of the scandal. With the criminal investigations of Cohen
he is still an RNC Deputy Finance Chairman. When will Republicans be outraged
by these misuse of funds in their Party?
The investigation has revealed
that Trump and his thug lawyer only has three clients over the past year. They
are Trump, Elliott Broidy and Sean Hannity who wanted his name to not be
revealed. Why? It is no surprise that the lead Commentator in defense of
everything Trump at FOX News just happens to be the client of Trump’s lawyer as
well. Yes, Trump’s thugs also spread out to the fake news media. Sean Hannity has been covering the story of
Cohen on his TV show but never revealed his personal connection to Trump. This
explains why his reporting of his version of the news is always pro-Trump.
At the Federal court hearing
Cohen’s lawyer went to great lengths to try to keep Hannity’s name a secret.
Why? We all know now that Cohen admitted to paying off a porn star $130,000 to
keep her silent. There was also a hefty payment paid to a play boy bunny for
her silence about Trump’s sex life. Is Cohen’s job to just clean up Trump and
his Thugs messes and tying in Republican National Committee into all this salacious
swamp? How is just paying off women for sex being a lawyer? The events are
better than any fictional law story on TV.
The Judge told Cohen’s lawyer
that “with respect to the client’s name (Hannity) being withheld, that is not
in accord with the law of this court.” The drama continued when another lawyer
approached the bench and said he represented the press, ABC, the New York
Times, Associated Press, CNN and Newsday. He pointed out that there is a public
assess issue here. He said, “That is the very nature of the First Amendment
access right, so that we, the people, and the press, can monitor our
institutions and have a rational basis for agreeing or disagreeing.” Trump and
his thugs who think they don’t have to come clean under the guise of
attorney-client privilege need a rude awakening when they even refuse to name
the names of their clients.
No comments:
Post a Comment